We have highlighted
mortgage
mis-selling within our brief history of mis
sold financial products where we have ilustrated a 20 year
period. Since October 31 2004 some types of mortgages have
been regulated under the FSA. With the increasing protection
afforded consumers there is now grounds for redress.
Due to a recent precedent, recourse for those homeowners
that have been repossessed or facing repossession and have
either suffered or are suffering severe financial hardship
is now available. The ruling centres around the code of
business governing mortgage brokers.
Mortgage
mis-selling has been prompted as a result of
mortgage advice having to be "suitable for that customer"
and that advisers "must make and retain a record"
of it being suitable. There are numerous facets of concern
within the process itself as well as self certification,
sub prime and right to buy.
Do
I qualify? Enquire now..... |
 |
If you feel you may have a case for being
mis sold a mortgage then there is a good chance you
have a claim for thousands. The recent precedent may
well be the tip of a very large iceberg. Is this the
next episode of misselling? To assist and guide
here are a few helpful concise points:
- Were you 'induced' into a contract. For example
were you a housing association tenant perhaps on
a fixed rate for life but persuaded to buy the property
on an initial fixed or dicounted rate.
- Were you charged a separate fee by the broker,
a fee which was perhaps a percentage of the loan.
- Were you a council tenant and entered into a Right
to Buy.
- Did you take out a self certification mortgage.
- Did your mortgage fall under adverse credit or
within sub prime borrowing.
- Was affordability discussed with you fully.
- Does your mortgage stretch beyond your retirement
date.
- These are a few main points and key issues, however
if you feel there are other mitigating circumstances
please contact
us selecting 'mortgage mis selling' while adding
your comments. This is our secure 128 bit encrypted
server.
Even if your mortgage began before 31 October 2004,
the rules may still apply, as mortgage "misrepresentation"
might also be feasible especially in the case of arrears.
You may well also have a case for
mortgage
mis-selling if the business was written
for the mortgage broker first and the client second,
i.e. motivated by commission.